This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the outcomes for disadvantaged pupils last academic year.
Detail |
Data |
Number of pupils in school |
All Saints Catholic High School |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
55 |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) |
2023/2024 to 2025/2026 |
Date this statement was published |
May 2023 |
Date on which it will be reviewed |
October 2023 |
Statement authorised by |
Andy English Headteacher |
Pupil premium lead |
Natasha William Assistant Headteacher |
Governor / Trustee lead |
Beccy Mackinney |
Detail |
Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year 23/24 |
£256680 |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year 23/24 |
£50239 |
Brought forward from previous years |
£0 |
Total budget for this academic year |
£306919 |
It is our intention to ensure that every student regardless of starting point and background achieves the best outcomes. It is our intention that all students from disadvantaged backgrounds perform as well as students from non-disadvantaged backgrounds. As an inclusive Catholic School, All Saints is aspirational for all students and is committed to providing exceptional teaching and learning for all students and the pupil Premium strategy is aimed at removing barriers to achieving this for disadvantaged students. |
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
1 |
Achievement: Disadvantaged HPA students on average make less progress than their peers |
2 |
To monitor reading ages and close any gaps so students can access the curriculum |
3 |
To improve outcomes at KS4 |
4 |
Behaviour and attitudes: Some disadvantaged students need additional support to address barriers to progress. |
5 |
To improve attendance to pre-pandemic levels |
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategic plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
Improve achievement: Narrow the achievement and progress gaps across the curriculum through consistently high standards and quality first teaching in every lesson together with targeted interventions that address knowledge gaps and improve outcomes with a focus on English and Maths. |
GCSE outcomes for disadvantaged students are strong and in line with those of all students in line with their peers and above the national and local averages. All disadvantaged students achieve outcomes that enable them to access high quality post 16 courses |
High levels of literacy including improving reading ages among disadvantaged pupils across school, specifically focusing on those pupils below their chronological reading age in KS3 and KS4 |
|
To achieve and sustain improved wellbeing for all pupils, including those who are disadvantaged. |
Sustained high levels of wellbeing from 2024/25 demonstrated by: qualitative and quantitative data from student voice, student and parent surveys and teacher observations. A significant increase in participation in enrichment activities, particularly among disadvantaged pupils. |
To achieve and sustain improved attendance for all pupils, particularly our disadvantaged pupils |
Sustained high attendance from 2024/25 demonstrated by:
|
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Budgeted cost: £ 14,500
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Support students to develop learning and self-regulation strategies to improve knowledge retention, revision strategies and home-learning |
Homework is has an effect size of +5 months. Metacognition and self regulation strategies support students to monitor and evaluate their own learning and has an effect size of 7 additional months over a year |
1,2,3 |
Summer School |
Students who attend summer school make more progress than their peers in the first term |
1,2 |
Budgeted cost: £ 153,492
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Lexia is used effectively in KS3 classes |
EEF research evidence found that children offered Lexia made the equivalent of two additional months’ progress in reading, on average, compared to other children. Additionally, the evidence suggests that disadvantaged children who were offered Lexia made, on average, the equivalent of three additional months’ progress in reading compared to other disadvantaged children. |
2 |
Use of Academic Mentors part funded by the recovery premium to provide support in English, Maths and Science in all year groups |
According to the EEF, one-to-one tuition is effective in improving outcomes.Targeted intervention can be an effective strategy for supporting students where there are emerging gaps in their knowledge. Evidence shows that tuition is likely to make an impact if it is additional to and explicitly linked to normal lessons. |
1,3 |
TA support for SEND students who are also disadvantaged |
EEF research has found that effective use of teaching assistants can provide a positive impact on pupil outcomes |
1,2,3 |
Additional teaching and targeted support through holiday a nd Saturday sessions for Year 10 and Year 11 |
EEF suggest small group intervention lead to four months’ additional progress over the course of a year. Pupil voice indicate that these are valued and build confidence |
1,3 |
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Education Welfare officer employed to support Home visits, attendance surgeries, meetings and support for the school in addressing poor attendance. |
Evidence shows that there is a strong positive correlation between attendance and achievement |
1,3,4,5 |
Additional leadership capacity through deputy Heads of year and pastoral support manager |
Provision of pastoral care enables educational barriers to be identified and addressed |
4,5 |
School Counsellor |
Engagement in couselling services helps to improve attendance and engagement in school |
4 |
WHAMS project |
Engagement in WHAMS project helps to improve attendance and engagement in school |
4,5 |
Rewards and recognition to positively reinforce and encourage good behaviour |
Positive feedback strengthens relationships and engagement and reinforce positive behaviours |
4 |
Subsidised peripatetic lessons for disadvantaged students |
Subsidised peripatetic lessons allow disadvantaged students to access music tuition and developing cultural capital |
4 |
Subsidised School trips, visits and extracurricular activities |
Engagement in wider curricular activities promotes positive relationships, build self esteem and promotes more engagement |
4,5 |
High quality careers guidance and targeted support to enure all disadvantage pupils make informed choices for employment, education or training |
Evidence shows that students who have a clear focus and identified next steps are more likely to be motivated in their learning |
1,3,4 |
Total budgeted cost: £ 306919
Outcomes for 2021- 2022 were strong. The P8 score was +0.18 compared to the national average of -0.55 and England non disadvantage P8 score of 0.15. and is higher than the whole school P8 score. This despite the challenges of the pandemic. The school remained open during the pandemic to disadvantaged students and this has supported their recovery. The attainment gap between disadvantaged students and their peers continues to narrow. The reading recovery programme has improved students’ reading ages enabling disadvantaged students to access the wider curriculum. |
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you used your pupil premium (or recovery premium) to fund in the previous academic year.
Programme |
Provider |
Lexia Power up |
Lexia Learning |
CAT 4 testing |
GLL Education |
WHAMS Project |
NHS |